Today I lunched with my favourite Mia, and Una tagged along.
Today I lunched with my favourite Mia, and Una tagged along.
I recently had a very interesting exchange with a fellow illustrator about reps, so I thought I’d share some of what we talked about here.
I don’t think illustrators necessarily need representation. I’ve said before: An illustrator without a rep is STILL an illustrator. But a rep without illustrators is just someone with nice business cards. (I sound like a big jerk there, and I’m sorry. If you’re a rep I’m sure I’ll hear from you and that’s totally cool.)
Click the “read more” link to see the full list and read all my opinionated blathering:
—
There is NO WAY contributors to Shutterstock earned an average of $1,100 this past year. Not when you’re selling clipart for $3 a pop, and not with a system that relies on an all-you-can-eat subscription model. But they are after all filing for an IPO, so they’re trying to look like the super-stock company, now that they’re intending to go up against Getty and Corbis. (My prediction: Corbis will buy them in a year, tops.)
Foap is a new stock photography market that curates good images from iPhone users for commercial use. If you’ve taken what you think is a particularly impressive photo, you can upload it via the Foap app. If it’s approved for sale via Foap’s team, it will get added to its own market. If a business or publisher uses the photo, they pay $US40; you get half of that ($US20) via PayPal, and Foap gets the other half. (via Lifehacker Australia)
Hm.
The trouble with our new espresso machine (saved >$200 on it, thank you Craigslist!) is the delicious increase in my caffeine consumption. (Taken with instagram)
I’m remembering old-timey things today, like Letraset. *sigh* Simpler times…
(via Scanning Around With Gene: When Letraset Was King | CreativePro.com)
I’m loath to link to anything from the Huffington Post (“Awkward Stock Wedding Photos”), but I have a point. (And in this case, it’s all rather fitting: a non-story about how trashy stock imagery is, on a fake “news” site, which is owned by AOL.)
This is how much of a joke stock has become. It’s part of our daily vocabulary now, and it’s used derisively. People never used the term “stock photo” 30–40 years ago, it wasn’t a thing. Not even when I was a kid, despite the fact that my Dad ran a newspaper for 10 years, and had stacks and stacks of clipart books at his office. But now rather than decorating articles, stock is making headlines instead and usually in pretty strange ways.